In Brief

One of the first con­sid­er­a­tions with any type of new ven­ture is how to pro­tect your busi­ness, valu­able idea or con­cept if you need to dis­close it to others.


When is a con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agree­ment needed?

If you need to dis­close your valu­able busi­ness infor­ma­tion or ideas to a poten­tial part­ner, advis­er or investor then a con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agree­ment is an essen­tial tool.

What is a con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agreement?

A Con­fi­den­tial­i­ty Agree­ment” or a Non-Dis­clo­sure Agree­ment” is a legal­ly bind­ing con­tract which con­tains promis­es from the recip­i­ent of the con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion to lim­it the use of the infor­ma­tion to a spe­cif­ic purpose.

Con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agree­ment tips

A con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agree­ment must do three things:

  • define what infor­ma­tion is con­fi­den­tial information”
  • iden­ti­fy the spe­cif­ic pur­pose the for which infor­ma­tion will be supplied
  • restrict its dis­clo­sure and iden­ti­fy any per­mis­si­ble disclosures.

The fol­low­ing state­ments should be includ­ed (if applicable):

  • dis­clo­sure is not intend­ed to trans­fer any rights in such information
  • there is no exclu­siv­i­ty grant­ed to the recip­i­ent in the con­fi­den­tial information
  • there is no oblig­a­tion on the dis­clos­er to pro­vide con­fi­den­tial information
  • the sup­ply of con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion does not con­sti­tute an offer of any kind
  • no war­ran­ty is giv­en about the accu­ra­cy or com­plete­ness of the information.

The fol­low­ing state­ments should be includ­ed (if applicable):

  • the recip­i­ent must keep the infor­ma­tion confidential
  • the recip­i­ent is respon­si­ble for any unau­tho­rised disclosure
  • the recip­i­ent acknowl­edges that breach of the agree­ment may cause loss to the discloser
  • the recip­i­ent indem­ni­fies the dis­clos­er for any loss aris­ing from the recipient’s breach of the agreement
  • the recip­i­ent must return all con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion on demand
  • the recip­i­ent agrees not to solic­it or approach employ­ees, cus­tomers or sup­pli­ers of the dis­clos­er or inter­fere with its business.

The fol­low­ing state­ments should be includ­ed (if applicable):

  • the term of the agree­ment – how long the agree­ment should be in force
  • gov­ern­ing law and juris­dic­tion – the laws of which state or coun­try should apply.

If you would like any fur­ther infor­ma­tion please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Ope­nAI’s screen­less future on pause amidst trade mark dispute

Back­groundIn ear­ly May, Ope­nAI sur­prised the tech world with news of an esti­mat­ed $6.4 bil­lion part­ner­ship and acqui­si­tion involv­ing ​“io”…

Impor­tant Stra­ta Law Changes — Effec­tive 1 July 2025

The Stra­ta Schemes Leg­is­la­tion Amend­ment Act 2025 (Amend­ing Act) intro­duces fur­ther reform in Gov­ern­men­t’s ongo­ing review of the stra­ta legislation. On 1 July…

Own­ers Cor­po­ra­tions / Asso­ci­a­tions now sub­ject to Unfair Con­tract Terms 

Under the new stra­ta law reforms com­menc­ing 1 July 2025 (the Stra­ta Schemes Leg­is­la­tion Amend­ment Act 2025 (No. 14) NSW) a key change…

In the News

Press Release | We are pleased to announce five senior pro­mo­tions in key prac­tice areas of the firm effec­tive, 1 July 2025

Con­grat­u­la­tions:Maris­sa Arag­o­na — AssociateRamesh Chamala — AssociateAaron Boz — AssociateWilliam Clement — Senior AssociateKel­lie Van Mun­ster — Spe­cial Counsel “I am per­son­al­ly delight­ed…

Michael Byrnes quot­ed in the arti­cle, “‘Creep­ing’ unfair dis­missal thresh­old will increase to $183k on 1 July”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 27 June 2025

Michael Byrnes quot­ed in the arti­cle, “‘Creep­ing’ unfair dis­missal thresh­old will increase to $183k on 1 July”, pub­lished in HR Leader…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ABC may face sig­nif­i­cant penal­ties’ after can­cel cul­ture’ sack­ing ruled unlaw­ful”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 26 June 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“ABC may face ​‘sig­nif­i­cant penal­ties’ after ​‘can­cel cul­ture’ sack­ing ruled unlaw­ful”, pub­lished in…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information