IN BRIEF


Your par­ents give you and your spouse some mon­ey – say, to buy a house. Then you split up. To what extent will your spouse get the ben­e­fit of the gift?


When a rela­tion­ship breaks up, the mat­ri­mo­ni­al prop­er­ty may need to be divid­ed between the par­ties. The court will go through the fol­low­ing steps:

  1. deter­min­ing whether it is appro­pri­ate to make an order divid­ing the prop­er­ty at all;

  2. iden­ti­fy­ing and valu­ing the assets, lia­bil­i­ties and finan­cial resources (oth­er­wise known as the pool” or mat­ri­mo­ni­al property”);

  3. assess­ing each par­ty’s con­tri­bu­tion to the pool;

  4. assess­ing each par­ty’s future needs;

  5. deter­min­ing what is just and equi­table in all the circumstances.

Parental gifts are an issue at step 3 – when assess­ing each par­ty’s con­tri­bu­tion to the pool.

One of the fac­tors the Court will con­sid­er is the direct or indi­rect finan­cial con­tri­bu­tion made by or on behalf of a par­ty to the mar­riage to the acqui­si­tion, con­ser­va­tion or improve­ment of mat­ri­mo­ni­al prop­er­ty.

Parental gifts are finan­cial con­tri­bu­tions made on behalf of…whom? You alone? Or you and your spouse jointly?

Some­times it’s dif­fi­cult to tell. Par­ents do not always have clear inten­tions about whether the gift is intend­ed for you alone, or you and your spouse togeth­er. The waters are fur­ther mud­died because, in almost all cas­es, your spouse will inevitably receive some indi­rect ben­e­fit from the gift (e.g. liv­ing in the gift­ed home, or pay­ing less on the mort­gage) – even if it was intend­ed for you alone. 

In most cas­es, the Court will assume that your par­ents intend­ed the gift to go to you alone. There­fore, the gift will be count­ed as your con­tri­bu­tion to the mar­riage. This does­n’t nec­es­sar­i­ly mean that you will keep the house” – but it will cer­tain­ly work in your favour.

If your spouse wants to argue that the gift should be count­ed as a joint con­tri­bu­tion, he/​she will need to pro­vide evi­dence that your par­ents intend­ed to give the gift to both par­ties. This is dif­fi­cult to prove, but has been suc­cess­ful in some cas­es (for instance, where the gift is in recog­ni­tion of both par­ties’ ser­vice to one par­ty’s parents).

The fact that the prop­er­ty is reg­is­tered in the name of one or both par­ties is not deter­mi­na­tive. The Court has wide pow­ers to alter prop­er­ty inter­ests and order the trans­fer of prop­er­ty between the par­ties.


What does this mean for me?

If your par­ents pro­vide a finan­cial gift, it’s bet­ter for you if they pro­vide it to you alone. Of course, this is ulti­mate­ly a deci­sion for your par­ents, not you.

If you are the oth­er par­ty, and your spouse’s par­ents pro­vide a finan­cial gift, you may wish to seek some clar­i­fi­ca­tion about who exact­ly the gift is intend­ed for. If it’s intend­ed for both par­ties, it’s prefer­able to get that in writing.

Ulti­mate­ly, the best way to quar­an­tine cer­tain assets from the mat­ri­mo­ni­al pool is to enter into a bind­ing finan­cial agree­ment. This can be done before or dur­ing the mar­riage, and pro­vides far more cer­tain­ty for every­one involved.


To speak to one of our Fam­i­ly Law spe­cial­ists, please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Res­i­den­tial Ten­an­cies Act 2010 (NSW) reforms and oblig­a­tions of land­lords — effec­tive from 19 May 2025

Intro­duc­tionThe Res­i­den­tial Ten­an­cies Act 2010 (NSW) (the Act) and the Res­i­den­tial Ten­an­cies Reg­u­la­tion 2019 (NSW) (the Reg­u­la­tions) have under­gone some sig­nif­i­cant…

Fail­ing to Reg­is­ter a PPSR Secu­ri­ty Inter­est on Time – Legal Risks and Options

Intro­duc­tionTime­ly reg­is­tra­tion of secu­ri­ty inter­ests under the Per­son­al Prop­er­ty Secu­ri­ties Act 2009 (Cth) (PPSA) is essen­tial for secured cred­i­tors to…

Con­struc­tion con­tracts are more than just a doc­u­ment — remove con­trac­tu­al claus­es at your peril

Your con­struc­tion con­tract will map out the path­way to your build­ing project com­plet­ing on time and with­in bud­get and detail­ing…

In the News

Press Release | New Part­ner Appoint­ment — Mark Glynn

With over two decades in the indus­try, Mark is a recog­nised front-end con­struc­tion lawyer spe­cial­ist with­in the build­ing and con­struc­tion indus­try. Mark…

Press Release | New Asso­ciate Appoint­ment — Hugo Mahony

“As we con­tin­ue to expand in line with our strate­gic vision, Hugo’s deep knowl­edge and expe­ri­ence in Com­mer­cial, Cor­po­rate, IP…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Police and Safe­Work are inves­ti­gat­ing MAFS, but the show keeps win­ning the rat­ings race”, pub­lished on ABC News on 6 April 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Police and Safe­Work are inves­ti­gat­ing MAFS, but the show keeps win­ning the rat­ings…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information