All publications relating to ‘Michael Byrnes’
Fair Work Commission rules out new approach to individual dispute
A New Approach Section 576(2)(aa) of the Fair Work Act (Act) confers upon the Fair Work Commission (FWC) the function to promote ‘cooperative and productive workplace relations and preventing disputes’. Pursuant to this provision, the FWC has implemented a jurisdiction called ‘New Approaches’, which has the aim of assisting employers, employees and…
Valentine’s Day in the Workplace
Valentine’s Day, the celebration of romance and romantic love, takes place annually on February 14. While many assiduously avoid what they consider to be a crass commercialisation of intimate relationships, others embrace with relish the opportunities it presents to either affirm or pursue romance. There has been some recent media coverage (usually with…
Using the Anti-Bullying Jurisdiction of the Fair Work Commission for Sexual Harassment Matters
The Limitations of the AHRC Sexual Harassment Jurisdiction Commentators (both lay and expert) have recently lamented that the Fair Work Commission (FWC) does not have a specific jurisdiction to expeditiously deal with sexual harassment complaints. Instead, the usual approach in sexual harassment matters (in the federal jurisdiction) is to lodge a complaint with…
An Employee’s Commute Thwarts an Employer Commuting Redundancy Pay
In the recent Fair Work Commission (FWC) decision in Australian Footwear T/A Diana Ferrari [2018] FWC 7864 the employer, a business trading under the name Diana Ferrari, applied to the FWC to vary the redundancy amount payable to an employee, Ms Tzortzis, whose employment was terminated on the basis of redundancy…
A Real Deal: An Unfair Dismissal Settlement Goes Wrong
We had a deal! An employer asserts an unfair dismissal case has been settled. The Applicant contends no such settlement has taken place. How can the employer resolve the matter? One avenue potentially open to employers is section 399A of the Fair Work Act (FW Act) which is in the following terms: “Dismissing…
Reheated Retweets: The Significance of a ‘Retweet’ in Employment
The CFMMEU Case In a recent case of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) (Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union-Construction and General Division, Queensland Northern Territory Divisional Branch [2018] FWC 6462), a ‘retweet’ by a member of the FWC, Senior Deputy President Hamberger, formed the basis of a submission by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime…
Competing Considerations: An Employee and her ‘Hobby Business’.
In the current age where any organisation, irrespective of size, can advertise to the world through the internet, the barriers to entry for “micro” or “hobby” businesses are lower than ever. Increasingly, employees are showing their ingenuity and entrepreneurship by setting up their own hobby businesses to the side of…
Abuse from the general public: The obligations of employers
Recently a radio presenter on ABC radio in Adelaide broke down in tears on air after receiving an abusive text message from a listener which had been sent through the station’s text feedback number. The text criticised the presenter stating that she had she had conducted “a pitiful interview”, claimed what she said…
Casual Employment: The new rules of engagement
A recent decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, WorkPac Pty Ltd v Skene [2018] FCAFC 131 (Skene), held that an employee who had been categorised as a “casual” by the employer, WorkPac, was not in fact a casual but rather a permanent employee and, as a result, entitled…
The “Weinstein Clause”: What is it? Could it be coming to Australia?
What is the “Weinstein Clause”? The disturbing revelations about Harvey Weinstein and other entertainment luminaries have put sexual harassment firmly on the agenda, emboldening victims to come forward to share experiences and pursue claims, leading to the rise of the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements internationally, and #NowAustralia locally. The latest consequence of…