Keep­ing you up-to-date with the lat­est legal devel­op­ments, leg­is­la­tion changes and case precedents.

Lat­est publications

Cor­po­ra­tions and defamation

Sev­er­al high-pro­file Aus­tralians have become embroiled in defama­tion cas­es in recent months.  A pub­li­ca­tion about a per­son com­mu­ni­cat­ed to a third par­ty is defam­a­to­ry if an ordi­nary rea­son­able per­son would think it tends to: injure that per­son­’s rep­u­ta­tion by dis­parag­ing them;cause oth­ers to shun or avoid them;sub­ject them to hatred, ridicule or contempt. Can a com­pa­ny sue for defamation? What…

Ter­mi­na­tion of employ­ment by SMS fails the fair­ness text

Tex­ting Times for Employers In two recent unfair dis­missal deci­sions, the Fair Work Com­mis­sion (FWC) has con­demned the prac­tice of ter­mi­nat­ing employ­ment by text message.  In the deci­sion of Kurt Wal­lace v AFS Secu­ri­ty 24 7 Pty Ltd (U2019/1622), Com­mis­sion­er Cam­bridge con­sid­ered the sub­mis­sion by the employ­er in respect of a ter­mi­na­tion by text, which was…

Bal­anc­ing costs and claims in fam­i­ly pro­vi­sion applications

Costs are an impor­tant con­sid­er­a­tion in all legal pro­ceed­ings. Deceased estate lit­i­ga­tion, how­ev­er, often involves lit­i­gants with mod­est means, and the asso­ci­at­ed finan­cial impli­ca­tions can there­fore be vast­ly dif­fer­ent to that of com­mer­cial dis­putes. Indeed, where a claim is made upon a small or mod­er­ate­ly sized estate, it may become more dif­fi­cult…

Work­place Sur­veil­lance Act 2005 (NSW) Admis­si­bil­i­ty of evi­dence unlaw­ful­ly obtained- lat­est developments

When it comes to the ques­tion of work­place sur­veil­lance, there are some employ­ers who are not aware of the impli­ca­tions of applic­a­ble work­place sur­veil­lance leg­is­la­tion, and who dis­cov­er its sig­nif­i­cance only when a chal­lenge is made to evi­dence secured through work­place sur­veil­lance activ­i­ties. In NSW, it is the require­ments of the…

How are pre-rela­tion­ship assets treat­ed in a prop­er­ty set­tle­ment? Are they includ­ed or excluded?

After sep­a­ra­tion the par­ties to a mar­riage or a defac­to rela­tion­ship are enti­tled to seek a divi­sion of assets of the rela­tion­ship. The assets of the rela­tion­ship include all assets held joint­ly or indi­vid­u­al­ly whether they were acquired pri­or, dur­ing or after the rela­tion­ship. It does not mat­ter which part­ner paid for the…

Get in touch

If you have any queries about a legal issue or wish to talk to someone about a legal matter please get in touch and we'll contact you promptly.

*Mandatory information