In Brief

Both land­lords and ten­ants should take care to ensure that the oth­er par­ty is bound by the lease rather than incur­ring sig­nif­i­cant expens­es on the assump­tion that the lease will proceed.


The risk

Land­lords and ten­ants often begin spend­ing mon­ey or incur­ring costs to cre­ate and fitout leased premis­es pri­or to the com­mence­ment date of the lease. The par­ties may have nego­ti­at­ed and agreed in prin­ci­ple on the terms of the lease, and one par­ty (usu­al­ly the ten­ant) may have even signed the lease. How­ev­er, both par­ties may not actu­al­ly be bound by the lease. 

If a par­ty incurs costs in rela­tion to the premis­es before both par­ties are bound to the lease, then that mon­ey may be lost if the oth­er par­ty with­draws from the lease before the lease becomes binding.

What expens­es are typ­i­cal­ly incurred by a tenant?

A ten­ant will typ­i­cal­ly incur expens­es in con­nec­tion with the design and fitout of the premis­es. These expens­es may be sig­nif­i­cant even if only the design ele­ment is com­plet­ed. If a ten­ant incurs such expens­es before the land­lord is bound by the lease, and either the land­lord or the ten­ant with­draws from the lease (in cir­cum­stances where it is enti­tled to do so), the ten­ant may not be enti­tled to recov­er those expens­es from the landlord.

What expens­es are typ­i­cal­ly incurred by a landlord?

A land­lord may agree to car­ry out cer­tain works to the premis­es as an incen­tive for the ten­ant to enter into the lease. Com­mon exam­ples include installing inter-ten­an­cy walls to sub­di­vide a larg­er space, or redec­o­ra­tion works to upgrade the premis­es. If either par­ty lat­er with­draws from the lease, apart from hav­ing expend­ed mon­ey on the rel­e­vant works, the land­lord may also incur addi­tion­al costs to undo the works if the land­lord is unable to find a new ten­ant to lease the premis­es in the same condition.

When is a par­ty bound to the lease?

The point at which one or both par­ties are bound to a lease depends on the terms of the heads of agree­ment, the lease and any agree­ment reached between the par­ties before the expens­es are incurred. 

It is com­mon for the heads of agree­ment to pro­vide that the lease is not bind­ing until the lease is signed by both parties. 

It is dif­fi­cult to change the posi­tion express­ly set out in the heads of agree­ment or the lease sim­ply by the behav­iour of one or both par­ties or sim­ply because one par­ty has expend­ed mon­ey on the assump­tion that the lease would proceed.

To avoid sit­u­a­tions such as the ones dis­cussed in this arti­cle, land­lords and ten­ants need to be aware of when the lease becomes bind­ing. If the lease is not bind­ing before one par­ty needs to incur sig­nif­i­cant expens­es, then it is advis­able to con­sid­er enter­ing into a sep­a­rate for­mal agree­ment con­firm­ing that both par­ties are bound to the lease.

If you have any ques­tions in rela­tion to whether or not you are bound to a lease please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

No Appor­tion­ment for Sec­tion 37 DBP Act Claims even where the alleged con­cur­rent wrong­do­er is not a sub­con­trac­tor of the builder:

Kapi­la v Mon­u­ment Build­ing Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306 con­firms that builders and nom­i­nat­ed super­vi­sors can be held ful­ly liable…

Tem­po­rary Dis­con­for­mi­ty in Build­ing Defects: Myth, Not Law

The ​“tem­po­rary dis­con­for­mi­ty” argu­ment in con­struc­tion dis­putes sug­gests that defec­tive work iden­ti­fied before prac­ti­cal com­ple­tion is not a breach while the…

The impor­tance of a Request for Tender

Issu­ing a request for ten­der (RFT) is more than just secur­ing the best or low­est price. An RFT is your oppor­tu­ni­ty to man­age…

In the News

The legal­i­ty of the Mar­ried at First Sight dis­missals”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 17 April 2026, Michael Byrnes is quoted.

Employ­ment issues sur­faced in this year’s sea­son of real­i­ty TV show Mar­ried at First Sight (MAFS), with rumours emerg­ing that…

Legal Essen­tials for Off Site Con­struc­tion | UNSW Sydney

A two-day con­struc­tion law short course equip­ping con­struc­tion and legal pro­fes­sion­als with the pro­cure­ment, reg­u­la­to­ry and dis­pute exper­tise required to…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, We asked a lawyer to unpack Jack­ie O’s $82m case, and where it could land for ARN and Kyle”, pub­lished in Medi­aweek on 9 April 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“We asked a lawyer to unpack Jack­ie O’s $82m case, and where it could…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information