In brief — Court of Appeal over­turns deci­sion in James Hardie case

On 17 Decem­ber 2010 the NSW Court of Appeal over­turned the 2009 Supreme Court deci­sion which found the direc­tors of James Hardie to be in breach of their duties.


James Hardie direc­tors in the Supreme Court

In April 2009, the Supreme Court of NSW found nine direc­tors of James Hardie to be in breach of their direc­tors’ duties by approv­ing a mis­lead­ing pub­lic state­ment to the effect that a new­ly set-up fund intend­ed for financ­ing claims from asbestos vic­tims was ful­ly fund­ed”. Infa­mous­ly, the fund was lat­er found to be under­fund­ed by approx­i­mate­ly $1.5 bil­lion. As a result the direc­tors were found to have breached their duties and were each banned from sit­ting on any board for peri­ods rang­ing from 5 to 15 years and were each fined between $30,000 and $350,000.

Supreme Court deci­sion overturned 

On 17 Decem­ber 2010 the NSW Court of Appeal over­turned the 2009 Supreme Court decision. 

In a unan­i­mous deci­sion Chief Jus­tice Jim Spigel­man and Appeal Judges Mar­garet Bea­z­ley and Roger Giles ruled that the Aus­tralian Secu­ri­ties and Invest­ments Com­mis­sion (ASIC) had failed to prove that the direc­tors actu­al­ly passed a res­o­lu­tion approv­ing the statement. 

Jus­tice Spigel­man held that one of the grounds for this con­clu­sion was a find­ing that ASIC had a duty of fair­ness to call a wit­ness whose role was such that there was a sig­nif­i­cant prob­a­bil­i­ty that he had rel­e­vant knowl­edge” of what hap­pened at the board meeting. 

ASIC’s fail­ure to call David Robb, a for­mer part­ner of Allens Arthur Robin­son who was one of James Hardie’s main exter­nal legal advis­ers on set­ting up the trust and who attend­ed the board meet­ing, under­mined the cogency of ASIC’s case that the res­o­lu­tion was passed”, Jus­tice Spigel­man said. 

Impli­ca­tions of the suc­cess­ful appeal 

The con­se­quence of the new­ly imposed duty of fair­ness is that it is now even hard­er for ASIC to bring a suc­cess­ful claim against a direc­tor. This has prompt­ed a series of heat­ed debates con­cern­ing ASIC and its use­ful­ness as our cor­po­rate regulator.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Valid­i­ty, void­abil­i­ty and unen­force­abil­i­ty in con­tract law

If you have entered into a con­tract, you or the oth­er par­ty have draft­ed with­out legal assis­tance, you should con­sid­er some…

Nav­i­gat­ing Pri­or­i­ty Dis­putes under the PPSR: Path­ways and con­sid­er­a­tions for Secured Parties

The Per­son­al Prop­er­ty Secu­ri­ties Reg­is­ter (PPSR) serves as a vital frame­work for estab­lish­ing and pro­tect­ing inter­ests in per­son­al prop­er­ty in Aus­tralia…

Tis the Sea­son to Avoid Fol­ly: Work­place Christ­mas Par­ties (2024 Edition)

It’s that time of year. The ​‘Sil­ly Sea­son’. For many organ­i­sa­tions, the offi­cial employ­er Christ­mas par­ty is imminent.The start­ing point for…

In the News

Pro­tect­ed Indus­tri­al Action and the NSW Rail dis­pute before the FWC, Michael Byrnes appeared on Sum­mer Break­fast with John Stan­ley on 2GB on 24 December

Michale Byrnes appeared on Sum­mer Break­fast with John Stan­ley on 2GB on 24 Decem­ber 2024 to dis­cuss pro­tect­ed indus­tri­al action…

Excit­ing News | Our New Look Swaab Web­site is Live

What’s New?User-Friend­ly Nav­i­ga­tion: Eas­i­ly find the infor­ma­tion you need with our intu­itive search func­tions, menus, and stream­lined layout.Enhanced Func­tion­al­i­ty: Our site…

Season’s Greet­ings from Swaab

This hol­i­day sea­son, we reflect on the chal­lenges and tri­umphs of the past year and look for­ward to the promise…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information