On 30 April 2012, the Fed­er­al Gov­ern­men­t’s report on its Con­ver­gence Review was released. The report aims to devel­op tech­no­log­i­cal­ly neu­tral leg­is­la­tion and pol­i­cy to meet trends and rapid changes in tech­nol­o­gy in the com­mu­ni­ca­tions and broad­cast­ing sec­tors such as social media, and tele­vi­sion and radio ser­vices deliv­ered over the internet.

The Report rec­om­mends prin­ci­ple-based reg­u­la­tion that pro­vides high-lev­el guid­ance to busi­ness­es and indi­vid­u­als on com­pli­ance, but is flex­i­ble enough to change with tech­no­log­i­cal advancements.

In par­tic­u­lar, three dis­tinct areas of change are recommended:

  1. Short term changes, includ­ing amend­ments to polices, pro­grams and leg­is­la­tion, such as a pub­lic inter­est’ test that will apply to changes in con­trol of con­tent ser­vice enter­pris­es and media oper­a­tors that have sig­nif­i­cant influ­ence in par­tic­u­lar local mar­kets. The pub­lic inter­est test aims to main­tain diver­si­ty at a nation­al lev­el and is intend­ed to com­ple­ment rather than dupli­cate the cur­rent pow­ers of the Aus­tralian Com­pe­ti­tion and Con­sumer Com­mis­sion in rela­tion to merg­ers and acquisitions.
  2. New con­tent ser­vices leg­is­la­tion to replace the Broad­cast­ing Ser­vices Act 1992 (Cth) as well as key areas of the Telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions Act and to pro­vide a new clas­si­fi­ca­tion sys­tem that reg­u­lates con­tent across dif­fer­ent media and reflects com­mu­ni­ty standards.
  3. Reform of com­mu­ni­ca­tions leg­is­la­tion to pro­vide for a tech­nol­o­gy-neu­tral frame­work that would apply to com­mu­ni­ca­tions infra­struc­ture, plat­forms, devices and ser­vices offered to the Aus­tralia public.

The Report pro­pos­es that a new com­mu­ni­ca­tions reg­u­la­tor be estab­lished to imple­ment the first stage of the rec­om­men­da­tions. It is not yet known when this will take place.

We will keep you updat­ed with the progress in the imple­men­ta­tion of the out­comes of the Con­ver­gence Review. In the mean­time, if you have any ques­tions, please con­tact Swaab Attorneys.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Copy­right and Gen­er­a­tive AI: what Aus­tralia can learn from the Meta and Anthrop­ic Rulings

In 2025, two U.S. court deci­sions, Kadrey v. Meta and Bartz v. Anthrop­ic, have pro­vid­ed the first real judi­cial answers…

Fed­er­al Court Deci­sion Lim­its Effec­tive Use of Set-Off in Con­trac­tu­al Annu­al Salary Arrangements

The Deci­sionIn a recent Fed­er­al Court deci­sion*, Jus­tice Per­ram held that while con­trac­tu­al set-off claus­es in an annu­al salary arrange­ment can…

Pro­tect­ing your tomor­row, today: The impor­tance of an endur­ing pow­er of attorney

We often talk about the impor­tance of draft­ing your estate plan­ning doc­u­ments, includ­ing how draft­ing your will can ensure your…

In the News

Sarah Heuv­el pro­vides insight into get­ting Rent Roll Trans­ac­tions Com­pli­ance Compliant

Sarah Heuv­el in an inter­view with Matthew Cial­lel­la of MC Broking & Advi­so­ry, dis­cuss rent roll trans­ac­tions and the three key…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court deci­sion relat­ing to salary arrange­ments, set-off claus­es and award compliance

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court…

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled ​“Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.To read the…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information