In Brief

ACMA’s most recent­ly pub­li­cised enforce­ment action, against Cel­lar­mas­ter Wines Pty Ltd (part of the Wool­worths group) acts as a time­ly reminder that every busi­ness must take suf­fi­cient care in man­ag­ing its respon­si­bil­i­ties under the Spam Act 2003 (Act).


Swaab has observed that ACMA has ramped up enforce­ment action in respect of spam com­plaints over the last six months, impos­ing more sanc­tions and high­er penal­ties than in pre­vi­ous periods.

Under the Act it is ille­gal to send, or cause to be sent, unso­licit­ed com­mer­cial elec­tron­ic mes­sages, includ­ing email, instant mes­sag­ing, SMS and MMS (text and image-based mobile phone mes­sag­ing) of a com­mer­cial nature. Cor­po­rate infor­ma­tion or announce­ments that are pure­ly fac­tu­al and that do not mar­ket any prod­ucts or ser­vices are exclud­ed. Mes­sages cov­ered by the Act include prod­uct offers, pro­mo­tions, com­pe­ti­tions, adver­tise­ments and fac­tu­al infor­ma­tion that includes those types of content.

Under the Act, every com­mer­cial mes­sage” that is sent must:

  1. be sent with the recip­i­en­t’s consent;
  2. con­tain accu­rate infor­ma­tion about the per­son or organ­i­sa­tion that autho­rised the send­ing of the mes­sage and how to con­tact them; and
  3. con­tain a clear, obvi­ous and func­tion­al unsub­scribe’ facil­i­ty to allow the recip­i­ent to opt out from receiv­ing mes­sages from that source in the future (and any unsub­scribe requests must be processed with­in five work­ing days of receipt).

Cel­lar­mas­ter Wines was penalised for send­ing mes­sages to cus­tomers who had pre­vi­ous­ly opt­ed-out of receiv­ing mar­ket­ing mes­sages. Some mes­sages were sent with­out an opt-out facil­i­ty. These errors result­ed in a $110,000 infringe­ment notice which was paid by Cel­lar­mas­ters in May 2013.

For more infor­ma­tion about spam, how to deal with an ACMA com­plaint or sup­port with ensur­ing that your busi­ness man­ages its respon­si­bil­i­ties under the Spam Act, con­tact our spe­cial­ist team at Swaab.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence Fol­ly Called Out by Fair Work Commission

In the recent Fair Work Com­mis­sion deci­sion Mr Bran­den Dey­sel v Elec­tra Lift Co.[2025] FWC 2289, Deputy Pres­i­dent Slevin applied a crit­i­cal…

Assess­ing Scope 3 Emis­sions: An analy­sis of the impli­ca­tions of Den­man Aberdeen Muswell­brook Scone Healthy Envi­ron­ment Group Inc v MACH Ener­gy Aus­tralia Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CA 163 (the Mount Pleas­ant decision)

Intro­duc­tionOn July 24, 2025, the New South Wales Court of Appeal (NSW­CA) deliv­ered a land­mark rul­ing in Den­man Aberdeen Muswell­brook Scone…

Work­place Rela­tion­ships: The Legal Posi­tion (Cold­play Con­cert Edition)

The recent sto­ry of col­leagues (a Chief Exec­u­tive Offi­cer and Chief Peo­ple Offi­cer (CPO)) whose appar­ent rela­tion­ship was cap­tured on…

In the News

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Fair Work warns lit­i­gants against using Chat­G­PT”, pub­lished in The Aus­tralian on 28 August 2025:

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Fair Work warns lit­i­gants against using Chat­G­PT”, pub­lished in The Aus­tralian on 2…

Con­grat­u­la­tions | Angela Har­vey & John Trinh for being recog­nised in 2025 Doyles Guide Rankings

We’re proud to announce that Angela Har­vey has been recog­nised in the 2025 Doyles Guide as a:Rec­om­mend­ed Lead­ing Estates Lit­i­ga­tion Lawyer…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Nights with John Stan­ley on 2GB and 4BC on 25 August 2025 to dis­cuss the legal aspects of work­place surveillance

Michael Byrnes appeared on Nights with John Stan­ley on 2GB and 4BC on 25 August 2025 to dis­cuss the legal…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information