The Cal­i­forn­ian employ­er watch­dog has deter­mined that Uber dri­vers should be clas­si­fied as employ­ees, not as inde­pen­dent con­trac­tors, and are there­fore enti­tled to reimbursements.

The Cal­i­forn­ian employ­er watch­dog has deter­mined that Uber dri­vers should be clas­si­fied as employ­ees, not as inde­pen­dent con­trac­tors, and are there­fore enti­tled to reimbursements.

Uber is appeal­ing the deci­sion as it refers to its dri­vers as part­ner dri­vers”, mean­ing they are inde­pen­dent con­trac­tors that should pay their own expenses.

Employ­ment law spe­cial­ist War­wick Ryan told Star­tUpS­mart that Aus­tralian star­tups still need to be aware of poten­tial issues around whether or not some­one is an employ­ee or inde­pen­dent con­trac­tor because it is a con­stant­ly lit­i­gat­ed area of the law”.

READ THE ARTICLE

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information