Monique Robb is inter­viewed by Accoun­tants­Dai­ly fol­low­ing a recent deci­sion in which The High Court ruled in favour of a tax­pay­er shift­ing her debts onto her spouse dur­ing their divorce prop­er­ty set­tle­ment proceedings. 

Speak­ing to Accoun­tants Dai­ly, Swaab senior asso­ciate, Monique Robb said the case was a depar­ture from the norm but believes it remains a dif­fi­cult case to argue.

The con­tro­ver­sy in this case aris­es because the ATO took the view that the Crown was not bound by the Fam­i­ly Law Act, i.e. the court could not order the ATO to sub­sti­tute one par­ty for anoth­er in the way it could with an insti­tu­tion­al lender, for exam­ple. The High Court dis­agreed,” said Ms Robb.

As the court needs to ensure the sub­sti­tu­tion does not neg­a­tive­ly affect the cred­i­tor in ques­tion, it is like­ly to remain rare for the court to order such a sub­sti­tu­tion. I antic­i­pate that par­ties may seek orders to this effect on the back of Tomaras, but I am doubt­ful that the court would find many occa­sions where it was appro­pri­ate to make the orders. 

In my view, the High Court has con­firmed the pow­er of the court to sub­sti­tute par­ties extends to debts owed to the Com­mon­wealth, but has not increased the like­li­hood that one spouse will be made sole­ly liable for the tax debt of the oth­er par­ty. I expect that it will remain a dif­fi­cult argu­ment, which would be sig­nif­i­cant­ly impact­ed by the abil­i­ty of the sub­sti­tut­ed par­ty to pay the debt.”

Read the full arti­cle on Accoun­tants Dai­ly here.

To under­stand more about the case, read the arti­cle writ­ten by Monique Robb and Kate­ri­na Lon­er­gan Com­mis­sion­er of Tax­a­tion v Tomaras: High Court rules that tax debts can be trans­ferred between spouse parties.’

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Fam­i­ly Law | Arbi­tra­tion vs Medi­a­tion, weigh­ing up what is right for you

There are var­i­ous options avail­able to assist par­ties to resolve their Fam­i­ly Law dis­pute out­side of lit­i­ga­tion, includ­ing medi­a­tion and…

A Will with no ben­e­fi­cia­ries? An expen­sive mistake

Con­sult­ing a lawyer might seem expen­sive to some. A defec­tive Will, how­ev­er, can prove even more costly. Will mak­ing is a sig­nif­i­cant com­po­nent of…

Super­an­nu­a­tion and rela­tion­ship breakdown

The Aus­tralian Finan­cial Review recent­ly ran an opin­ion piece (by Tim Mack­ay) on the ATO announc­ing that it is using…

In the News

Monique Robb in Accoun­tants­Dai­ly dis­cussing tax debts in divorce proceedings

Speak­ing to Accoun­tants Dai­ly, Swaab senior asso­ciate, Monique Robb said the case was a depar­ture from the norm but believes it…

Pod­cast | How do courts bal­ance reli­gious beliefs against the best inter­ests of a child?

Fam­i­ly Law leg­is­la­tion dic­tates that a court’s para­mount con­sid­er­a­tion should be the best inter­ests of a child, and there are numer­ous fac­tors…

Con­grat­u­la­tions to the Fam­i­ly Law team for their list­ings in Doyle’s Guide!

The Fam­i­ly Law team at Swaab have been recog­nised by Doyle’s Guide for 2019 and have been list­ed as a Lead­ing…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information